Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMI
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Attività
  • Ambiti
  • Strutture
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Terza Missione

Expertise & Skills
Logo UNIMI

|

Expertise & Skills

unimi.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Attività
  • Ambiti
  • Strutture
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Terza Missione
  1. Pubblicazioni

Assessment of the application for renewal of the authorisation of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 as a feed additive for all animal species

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2020
Citazione:
Assessment of the application for renewal of the authorisation of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 as a feed additive for all animal species / V. Bampidis, G. Azimonti, M.D.L. Bastos, H. Christensen, B. Dusemund, M. Kouba, M. Kos Durjava, M. Lopez-Alonso, S. Lopez Puente, F. Marcon, B. Mayo, A. Pechova, M. Petkova, F. Ramos, Y. Sanz, R.E. Villa, R. Woutersen, P.S. Cocconcelli, B. Glandorf, L. Herman, M. Prieto Maradona, M. Saarela, M. Anguita, J. Galobart, O. Holczknecht, P. Manini, F. Pizzo, J. Tarres-Call, E. Pettenati. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - 18:6(2020 Jun 15). [10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6166]
Abstract:
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 as a technological additive for all animal species. The applicant has provided evidence that the additive currently in the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. There was no new evidence that would lead the FEEDAP Panel to reconsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the Panel concluded that the additive remains safe for all animal species, consumer and the environment under the authorised conditions of use. The additive was not irritant to skin and eyes but considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. The present application for renewal of the authorisation did not include a proposal for amending or supplementing the conditions of the original authorisation that would have an impact on the efficacy of the additive. Therefore, there was no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.
Tipologia IRIS:
01 - Articolo su periodico
Keywords:
all animal species; Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244; safety; silage additive; technological additive
Elenco autori:
V. Bampidis, G. Azimonti, M.D.L. Bastos, H. Christensen, B. Dusemund, M. Kouba, M. Kos Durjava, M. Lopez-Alonso, S. Lopez Puente, F. Marcon, B. Mayo, A. Pechova, M. Petkova, F. Ramos, Y. Sanz, R.E. Villa, R. Woutersen, P.S. Cocconcelli, B. Glandorf, L. Herman, M. Prieto Maradona, M. Saarela, M. Anguita, J. Galobart, O. Holczknecht, P. Manini, F. Pizzo, J. Tarres-Call, E. Pettenati
Autori di Ateneo:
VILLA ROBERTO EDOARDO ( autore )
Link alla scheda completa:
https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/828661
Link al Full Text:
https://air.unimi.it/retrieve/handle/2434/828661/1749284/j.efsa.2020.6166.pdf
  • Aree Di Ricerca

Aree Di Ricerca

Settori


Settore VET/07 - Farmacologia e Tossicologia Veterinaria
  • Informazioni
  • Assistenza
  • Accessibilità
  • Privacy
  • Utilizzo dei cookie
  • Note legali

Realizzato con VIVO | Progettato da Cineca | 26.1.3.0