Data di Pubblicazione:
2018
Citazione:
A Study of Argumentative Characterisations of Preferred Subtheories / M. D'Agostino, S. Modgil - In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2018 / [a cura di] J. Lang. - Prima edizione. - Ebook. - [s.l] : Iinternational Joint Conferences in Artificial Intelligence (IJCA), 2018. - ISBN 9780999241127. - pp. 1788-1794 (( convegno IJCAI tenutosi a Stockolm nel 2018.
Abstract:
Classical logic argumentation (Cl-Arg) under the stable semantics yields argumentative characterisa- tions of non-monotonic inference in Preferred Sub- theories. This paper studies these characterisations under both the standard approach to Cl-Arg, and a recent dialectical approach that is provably rational under resource bounds. Two key contributions are made. Firstly, the preferred extensions are shown to coincide with the stable extensions. This means that algorithms and proof theories for the admissible semantics can now be used to decide credulous inference in Preferred Subtheories. Secondly, we show that as compared with the standard approach, the grounded semantics applied to the dialectical approach more closely approximates sceptical inference in Preferred Subtheories.
Tipologia IRIS:
03 - Contributo in volume
Elenco autori:
M. D'Agostino, S. Modgil
Link alla scheda completa:
Titolo del libro:
Proceedings of IJCAI 2018