Advantage of endoscopic-ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration associated to Sendai clinical guidelines in detecting the malignant risk in patients with undetermined pancreatic cysts: Long-term follow-up

Aims: Contradictory information exists on whether different clinical guidelines are effective in detecting the malignant risk in patients with pancreatic cysts. We have retrospectively evaluated the accuracy and the long-term outcome in patients with pancreatic cysts with a diameter ≥ 2 cm when indication for surgery was established by clinical evaluation of their malignant risk according to Sendai Clinical Guidelines associated to endoscopic-ultrasoundfine-needle aspiration. Methods: Patients with pancreatic cysts with a diameter ≥2 cm were evaluated for their potential malignant risk by endoscopic-ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration associated to the clinical evaluation by Sendai Clinical Guidelines. Long-term outcome and comparison in patients survival as well as the accuracy in detecting malignancies were evaluated with the combined clinical and endoscopic evaluation. Results: Two hundred eighteen patients with pancreatic cysts were observed during a 9-year period of the study and 74 of them (33.9%) presenting with a pancreatic cyst ≥ 2 cm were eligible for the study. Fourteen malignant neoplasms (18.9%) were detected. The accuracy in detecting malignancy of combined clinical and endoscopic evaluation was very high (0.99). The five-year survival rates for patients who underwent surgery with benign and malignant pancreatic cysts and for patients in observational follow-up were similar (70% and 85%). The cohort of patients with malignant pancreatic cysts with ductal adenocarcinoma showed a five-year survival rate of 41%. Conclusion: Endoscopic ultrasound fineneedle aspiration associated to Sendai clinical guidelines showed a high accuracy in detecting malignant risk in patients with pancreatic cysts with a diameter ≥ 2 cm. allowing appropriate selection for surgical treatment with satisfactory long-term survival.