¡Haz lo correcto! Robert Alexy y la pretensión de corrección = Do the Right Thing! - Robert Alexy and the Claim to Correctness

This essay aims to evaluate the argument from the claim of correctness proposed by Robert Alexy in defence of his inclusive non-positivism. The argument from correctness postulates that participants within a legal system necessarily lay claim to correctness, where “participant” is to be understood as somebody who is seeking the correct legal answer inside a given normative system. Through a comparison with Moore’s Paradox, it will be proposed that an expression of will (or desire), rather than a claim to correctness, is involved in every normative speech act. The latter, with the aim to overturn the thesis according to which every legal speech act claims correctness