L'AUTOCONTROLLO PENALE. RESPONSABILITÀ PENALE E MODELLI DI AUTONORMAZIONE DEI DESTINATARI DEL PRECETTO
Doctoral Dissertation
Publication Date:
2019
Citation:
L'AUTOCONTROLLO PENALE. RESPONSABILITÀ PENALE E MODELLI DI AUTONORMAZIONE DEI DESTINATARI DEL PRECETTO / S.b. Taverriti ; tutor: C.E. Paliero ; coordinatore: C. Luzzati; supervisor alla UC Berkeley: J. Simon. DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE GIURIDICHE "CESARE BECCARIA", 2019 Feb 06. 31. ciclo, Anno Accademico 2018. [10.13130/taverriti-sara-bianca_phd2019-02-06].
abstract:
One of the crucial challenges of Criminal Law in the new millennium is to deal with the complexity of contemporary society. The traditional approach based on the State monopoly on criminal matters keeps abreast no longer with the scientific-technological sophistication and the rate of changes in criminal behavior in the era of globalization. In this scenario, we witness the rise of Self-Regulation as an auxiliary tool of crime prevention, whose main goal is to fill the vacuum and to compensate for the rapid obsolescence of state legislation. Compliance Programs, Anti-Bribery Plans, Clinical Guidelines are some of the elements of a diverse constellation of cases in which preventive measures, behavioral rules, surveillance, and sanctions are issued and enforced by a legislator who coincides with the recipient, and which is often a private actor.
Nevertheless, the ambivalence of Self-Regulation lies in the fact that – in the face of some positive externalities promised – this paradigm could jeopardize some of the fundamental principles of Criminal Law. The aim of this work is to provide a critical analysis of such phenomenon in order to verify the compatibility of Self-Regulation with the Rule of Law and to assess its efficacy in deterring and detecting misconducts.
Nevertheless, the ambivalence of Self-Regulation lies in the fact that – in the face of some positive externalities promised – this paradigm could jeopardize some of the fundamental principles of Criminal Law. The aim of this work is to provide a critical analysis of such phenomenon in order to verify the compatibility of Self-Regulation with the Rule of Law and to assess its efficacy in deterring and detecting misconducts.
IRIS type:
Tesi di dottorato
Keywords:
autonormazione; self-regulation; self regulation; meta-regulation; meta regulation; enforced self regulation; smart regulation; responsive regulation; enforcement pyramid; autocontrollo; autodichia; autopoiesi; privatizzazione fonti; deregulation; welfare state; stakeholder theory; globalizzazione giuridica; shareholder theory; teoria dei sistemi; diritto riflessivo; sub-sistemi; diritto sanzionatorio; prevenzione; extrema ratio; frammentarietà; ordinamenti giuridici; internormatività; politica criminale; sussidiarietà; penale; pluralismo giuridico; globalizzazione; global governance; business social responsibility; Corporate Citizenship; Corporate Criminal Liability; Non Prosecution Agreement; NPA; DPA; Deferral Prosecution Agreement; 231; modelli 231; 231/2001; 231 2001; MOG; MOGC; Compliance Programs; Anticorruzione; Corruzione; piani prevenzione corruzione; piani per la prevenzione della corruzione; piani anticorruzione; 190/2012; L 190 2012; PNA; ANAC; autorità nazionale anticorruzione; Anti-Bribery Plan; linee guida medico-chirurgiche; gelli-bianco; balduzzi; clinical guidelines; medical guidelines; codice deontologico; codici deontologici; Interventionsrecht; reati d'obbligo; reato d'obbligo; riserva di legge; scriminanti procedurali; cause di giustificazione procedurali; colpa; colpa specifica; colpa generica; colpa protocollare; colpa procedurale; colpa di organizzazione; responsabilità dell'ente; delitto riparato; riparatorio; ultima ratio
List of contributors:
S.B. Taverriti
Link to information sheet: