Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMI
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Projects
  • Fields
  • Units
  • Outputs
  • Third Mission

Expertise & Skills
Logo UNIMI

|

Expertise & Skills

unimi.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Projects
  • Fields
  • Units
  • Outputs
  • Third Mission
  1. Outputs

Relationship between adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs, number of coprescribed drugs, and drug load in a large cohort of consecutive patients with drug-refractory epilepsy

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2010
Citation:
Relationship between adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs, number of coprescribed drugs, and drug load in a large cohort of consecutive patients with drug-refractory epilepsy / M.P. Canevini, G. De Sarro, C.A. Galimberti, G. Gatti, L. Licchetta, A. Malerba, G. Muscas, A. La Neve, P. Striano, E. Perucca, SOPHIE Study Group. - In: EPILEPSIA. - ISSN 0013-9580. - 51:5(2010 May), pp. 797-804.
abstract:
PURPOSE:
To evaluate the adverse effects (AEs) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adults with refractory epilepsy and their relationship with number of coprescribed AEDs and AED load.
METHODS:
Patients with refractory epilepsy were enrolled consecutively at 11 tertiary referral centers. AEs were assessed through unstructured interview and the Adverse Event Profile (AEP) questionnaire. AED loads were calculated as the sum of prescribed daily dose (PDD)/defined daily dose (DDD) ratios for each coprescribed AED.
RESULTS:
Of 809 patients enrolled, 709 had localization-related epilepsy and 627 were on polytherapy. AED loads increased with increasing number of AEDs in the treatment regimen, from 1.2 +/- 0.5 for patients on monotherapy to 2.5 +/- 1, 3.7 +/- 1.1, and 4.7 +/- 1.1 for those on two, three, and > or =4 AEDs, respectively. The number of spontaneously reported AEs correlated with the number of AEs identified by the AEP (r = 0.27, p < 0.0001). AEP scores did not differ between patients with monotherapy and patients with polytherapy (42.8 +/- 11.7 vs. 42.6 +/- 11.2), and there was no correlation between AEP scores and AED load (r = -0.05, p = 0.16).
CONCLUSIONS:
AEs did not differ between monotherapy and polytherapy patients, and did not correlate with AED load, possibly as a result of physicians' intervention in individualizing treatment regimens. Taking into account the limitations of a cross-sectional survey, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that AEs are determined more by individual susceptibility, type of AEDs used, and physicians' skills, than number of coprescribed AEDs and AED load.
IRIS type:
01 - Articolo su periodico
List of contributors:
M.P. Canevini, G. De Sarro, C.A. Galimberti, G. Gatti, L. Licchetta, A. Malerba, G. Muscas, A. La Neve, P. Striano, E. Perucca, SOPHIE Study Group
Authors of the University:
CANEVINI MARIA PAOLA ( author )
Link to information sheet:
https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/151198
  • Research Areas

Research Areas

Concepts (2)


Settore MED/26 - Neurologia

Settore MED/39 - Neuropsichiatria Infantile
  • Guide
  • Help
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notices

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.7.0.0