Data di Pubblicazione:
2017
Citazione:
Social services to claim legitimacy : comparing autocracies’ performance / A. Cassani. - In: CONTEMPORARY POLITICS. - ISSN 1356-9775. - 23:3(2017), pp. 348-368. [10.1080/13569775.2017.1304321]
Abstract:
Autocrats cannot rule by repression and co-optation alone, and need to instil some sense of legitimacy in the populace. Lacking democratic legitimacy, and being in shortage of other identity-based sources of diffuse support, legitimation claims in post-Cold War autocracies increasingly rests on rulers’ ability to achieve concrete outcomes, including the improvement of citizen living conditions. However, autocracies differ from each other, and different institutional arrangements could influence a leader’s ability to deliver social services, and chase performance-based legitimation. Accordingly, this article compares the social service performance of different post-Cold War authoritarian regimes. The analysis demonstrates that so-called electoral autocracies outperform single-party and military regimes, although they show a capacity to provide for their citizens that is similar to hereditary regimes. These findings suggest that the legitimacy returns of introducing semi-competitive and participatory institutions could grow exponentially. Besides procedural legitimacy, these institutions could help rulers pursue legitimation through social services.
Tipologia IRIS:
01 - Articolo su periodico
Keywords:
Electoral authoritarianism; legitimation; regime performance; social services; Sociology and Political Science; Political Science and International Relations
Elenco autori:
A. Cassani
Link alla scheda completa: