Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIMI
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Projects
  • Fields
  • Units
  • Outputs
  • Third Mission

Expertise & Skills
Logo UNIMI

|

Expertise & Skills

unimi.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Projects
  • Fields
  • Units
  • Outputs
  • Third Mission
  1. Outputs

Recent advances and current challenges of new approach methodologies in developmental and adult neurotoxicity testing

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2024
Citation:
Recent advances and current challenges of new approach methodologies in developmental and adult neurotoxicity testing / M.M. Serafini, S. Sepehri, M. Midali, M. Stinckens, M. Biesiekierska, A. Wolniakowska, A. Gatzios, E. Runden-Pran, E. Reszka, M. Marinovich, T. Vanhaecke, J. Roszak, B. Viviani, T. Sengupta. - In: ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY. - ISSN 0340-5761. - 98:5(2024), pp. 1271-1295. [10.1007/s00204-024-03703-8]
abstract:
Adult neurotoxicity (ANT) and developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) assessments aim to understand the adverse effects and underlying mechanisms of toxicants on the human nervous system. In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on the so-called new approach methodologies (NAMs). The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), together with European and American regulatory agencies, promote the use of validated alternative test systems, but to date, guidelines for regulatory DNT and ANT assessment rely primarily on classical animal testing. Alternative methods include both non-animal approaches and test systems on non-vertebrates (e.g., nematodes) or non-mammals (e.g., fish). Therefore, this review summarizes the recent advances of NAMs focusing on ANT and DNT and highlights the potential and current critical issues for the full implementation of these methods in the future. The status of the DNT in vitro battery (DNT IVB) is also reviewed as a first step of NAMs for the assessment of neurotoxicity in the regulatory context. Critical issues such as (i) the need for test batteries and method integration (from in silico and in vitro to in vivo alternatives, e.g., zebrafish, C. elegans) requiring interdisciplinarity to manage complexity, (ii) interlaboratory transferability, and (iii) the urgent need for method validation are discussed.
IRIS type:
01 - Articolo su periodico
Keywords:
Adult neurotoxicity; Adverse outcome pathways; Developmental neurotoxicity; New approach methodologies
List of contributors:
M.M. Serafini, S. Sepehri, M. Midali, M. Stinckens, M. Biesiekierska, A. Wolniakowska, A. Gatzios, E. Runden-Pran, E. Reszka, M. Marinovich, T. Vanhaecke, J. Roszak, B. Viviani, T. Sengupta
Authors of the University:
MIDALI MIRIAM ( author )
SERAFINI MELANIA MARIA ( author )
VIVIANI BARBARA ( author )
Link to information sheet:
https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/1043209
Full Text:
https://air.unimi.it/retrieve/handle/2434/1043209/2401795/s00204-024-03703-8.pdf
Project:
Twinning towards excellence in alternative methods for toxicity assessment (TWINALT)
  • Research Areas

Research Areas

Concepts


Settore BIO/14 - Farmacologia
  • Guide
  • Help
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notices

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0