A rational account of classical logic argumentation for real-world agents
Contributo in Atti di convegno
Data di Pubblicazione:
2016
Citazione:
A rational account of classical logic argumentation for real-world agents / M. D'Agostino, S. Modgil - In: ECAI 2016 / [a cura di] G. A. Kaminka, M. Fox, P. Bouquet, E. Hullermeier, V. Dignum, F. Dignum, F. van Harmelen. - Prima edizione. - [s.l] : IOS Press, 2016. - ISBN 9781614996712. - pp. 141-149 (( Intervento presentato al 22. convegno ECAI 2016 tenutosi a The Hague nel 2016.
Abstract:
Classical logic based argumentation (ClAr) characterises single agent non-monotonic reasoning and enables distributed non-monotonic reasoning amongst agents in dialogues. However, features of ClAr that have been shown sufficient to ensure satisfaction of rationality postulates, preclude their use by resource bounded agents reasoning individually, or dialectically in real-world dialogue. This paper provides a new formalisation of ClAr that is both suitable for such uses and satisfies the rationality postulates. We illustrate by providing a rational dialectical characterisation of Brewka’s non- monotonic Preferred Subtheories defined under the assumption of restricted inferential capabilities.
Tipologia IRIS:
03 - Contributo in volume
Keywords:
Argumentation Theory; Classical Logic; Dialogue
Elenco autori:
M. D'Agostino, S. Modgil
Link alla scheda completa:
Link al Full Text:
Titolo del libro:
ECAI 2016